When it comes to managing supplier data, the approaches run the gamut—from sophisticated to chaotic. We've all seen it: someone proudly managing vendors using a spreadsheet that predates the internet, or the ambitious genius who insists, "I’ve memorized it all." And then there's that one person joking about getting supplier contacts tattooed for 'permanent reference.' (I mean, points for commitment, but yikes!)
Level 1: Using Software to Manage Suppliers
This is the practical, powerhouse move similar to choosing a GPS over a treasure map drawn on a napkin.
Why D365 F&O Wins:
Centralized Vendor Records: All supplier details live in one place—from addresses to contracts and performance notes.
Vendor Collaboration Portal: Empower suppliers to update their own information, reducing email tag. Plus, there's a lot of investment in this by Microsoft and will only get better with time.
Integration with Procurement and Payables: D365 F&O connects vendor information directly to purchasing workflows, streamlining approvals, payments, and tracking.
Power BI Reports: Need insights into on-time deliveries or spend analysis? Prebuilt dashboards in D365 can replace hours of manual reporting.
Dad Joke Break: Why did the supplier love D365? Because it never forgot their terms of endearment.
Level 2: Managing Everything in Excel and Email
The default option for many organizations: the infamous spreadsheet + inbox combo.
The Problems:
Versioning Chaos: "Wait, is this the latest spreadsheet or last week's backup?"
Human Error: One accidental keystroke can turn a payment address into a vacation home.
Search Fatigue: "Did they email me their banking info, or is that in my archive?"
Why D365 F&O is Better:
Audit Trails: Every vendor update in D365 F&O is tracked, reducing guesswork.
Automated Workflows: Reminders and approvals are built into the system. No more chasing approvers via email.
Consistency: Templates for vendor onboarding ensure everyone follows the same process.
Level 3: Just Remembering Everything
Ah, the memory master—someone who insists they don’t need documentation because they "just know."
The Problems:
Limited Bandwidth: Even the sharpest minds can forget when supplier lists grow.
Risk: If your memory wizard leaves, so does critical vendor information.
No Transparency: Nobody else can access the info unless they borrow someone’s brain.
Why D365 F&O is Better:
Role-Based Access: Team members can see what they need without gatekeeping.
Collaborative Visibility: Approvers, buyers, and finance teams all work from the same source of truth.
Sustainability: Your vendor data lives in the system, not someone’s neurons.
Level 4: Getting Supplier Details Tattooed on You
This one is more metaphorical (we hope), but let’s run with it.
The Problems:
Updating Contact Info: You can’t just ‘Edit’ when the supplier changes phone numbers.
Privacy Concerns: Not exactly GDPR-compliant.
Pain Factor: Do you really want your supplier’s tax ID on your arm?
Why D365 F&O is Better:
Editable Fields: Update supplier details with zero pain.
Secure Information: Data security measures ensure only the right people access sensitive vendor information.
Scalability: No more running out of space (unless you also manage tattoos like a spreadsheet).
Managing suppliers shouldn’t feel like a memory game or a body art commitment. D365 F&O’s vendor management tools let you focus on strategy rather than survival. And while tattoos can be cool, we recommend using D365 over skin-based supplier lists. After all, digital workflows age much more gracefully than ink.
Bonus Dad Tip: If your team insists on holding onto spreadsheets, remind them: “We’re here to innovate, not marinate.” And remember, D365 F&O’s vendor management might not come with tattoos, but it does leave a lasting impression—no needles required.
So, what's your supplier management style? If you're still in the "tattoo and memory" stage, let's talk.
DynamicsDad
Comments